“The first Quakers discovered a source of insight, power and guidance within themselves, which they called by various names, including ‘the Inward Guide’, ‘the Light’, ‘the Seed’, ‘the Inward Teacher’ and ‘the Inward Christ’. Over centuries, the Religious Society of Friends has developed and refined a tradition of spiritual practice that can help to nurture a conscious connection to this source of inward guidance.”(Craig Barnett, The Guided Life)
But this is not a vague or random process. Quaker practice blends key principles into a method used faithfully since the late seventeenth century. It comes from regular commitment to personal discernment, which in turn underpins the ability of a group to discern too. Although there are many aspects of a process of discernment, in practice they blend in a fluid way, and may include:
- gathering and reviewing relevant information,
- recognising and setting aside fixed opinions, bias, emotional reactions or other internal ‘noise’,
- listening to a wide variety of points of view, remembering that each one has a ‘measure of the light” – holds a part of the truth,
- becoming still or centred, allowing the body, thoughts and feelings to settle down,
- opening the mind, heart and will to listen for what arises in you whatever it may be,
- tuning in to your deepest inward place, however you recognise it, then waiting and listening,
- reflecting with care on what arises in the stillness and
- finding words that best express the decision or direction that reflects this,
- in a group, crystallising a sense of a decision or direction into words which are initially drafted by the clerk, a person who is charged with listening for ‘the sense of the meeting’; their ‘draft minute’ is then refined by those present until all are satisfied it represents the most accurate expression that can be given of the sense of the meeting at this time,
- a decision that is discerned, whether personally or by a group, will be tested by being put into action and reviewed, and modified where necessary.
Discernment rests on the experience of early Quakers who found that when they sat in a still and listening silence together, they experienced a sense of presence that would guide them if they were faithful to it:
“in the depth of common worship it is as if we found our separate lives were all one life, within whom we live and move and have our being.”
(Thomas Kelly, Quaker faith & practice 2.36)
Some words are about how and what we experience and understand God / Spirit / Light / Teacher / Energy / Soul / inner source and other terms to be. Some are words or phrases that illustrate other facets of discernment. They are linked but with different usage; examples are Spirit-led; promptings of love and truth; being led; a leading, and many more. There are other Quaker discernment processes that are used in particular situations – e.g. clearness, threshing, testing, concern, Meeting for Worship for Business, clerking, nominations.
Sometimes the word discernment is used about quite routine or minor decisions; nevertheless, it still reflects a faithful commitment that decisions are Spirit-led. On other occasions, a discernment may be reached after a long and difficult period of wrestling with an issue, and represents a growing point or radical new direction. Yet, the outcome is a decision that is in unity. Where it is a matter of personal discernment, the decision – made after much heart-searching – may be very different to what we might have considered at the outset yet its unity is felt as a true sense of our prompting. When a decision is the outcome of a group discernment, affirming the group is in unity means those present accept it has been reached properly through Quaker discernment, even though some may struggle with the content of the decision. What is essential is to recognise that discernment is a skill to be practised. As individuals we can each become familiar and more practised at recognising the particular ways from nudges to gut instincts that are attuned to our Inward Light. It is important to distinguish between the many ‘voices’ we encounter within and discern which are true and which are not. Similarly, in a group, we learn to listen for and to the measure of truth that is in other points of view which may be quite contrary to our own yet, together, make up a tapestry from which the discerned direction becomes clear.